Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
This is an excerpt from an old article-unfortunately I can't cite the source and even if I could the link is probably dead. "It is well known by pilots that certain types of smoke are distinguishable. Air conditioner smoke is not necessarily indicative of a catastrophic fire or failure, and is readily identifiable by its "oily" smell. In contrast, smoke from an electrical fire, indicating a possibly serious or catastrophic failure, is acrid, heavy, extremely pungent, and easily recognized. While it seems unlikely that an alert crew would mistake one for the other, any type of smoke in the cockpit should cause a crew to take action to position the aircraft for an immediate landing." | |||
|
Barbara... Interesting reading, but I do not think that I would let my nose be the fire marshal. Again, I say, go after lessons learned. Land. | ||||
|
"Again, I say, go after lessons learned. Land." I totally agree with you Cecil! Just wanted to add, and never reset circuit breakers-solve the problem on the ground. Surprisingly, I still run across a few accident reports where the pilots do hestitate and try to continue flying despite an odor of smoke, or worse. | ||||
|
And yet following the sr111 tragedy there were still many people that defended the strict following of checklists. Here is an article that appeared on aviationnewsweb.com: The Wall Street Journal reported on 9/18/98, page B6, that Delta and FedEx reemphasized the emergency procedures for fire or smoke on the MD11 to their pilots. In summary, the safety update tells pilots to land the MD11 immediately and ask questions later. According to the WSJ, the safety updates from Delta and FedEx were issued in light of discovery that the pilots of Swiss Air 111 smelled a burning smell approximately three minutes before their initial call to air traffic control. The pilots followed standard operating procedures and started troubleshooting the problem via use of a checklist. The debate centers on whether they should have forgot the checklist and immediately started an emergency decent and landing. Proponents of checklists suggest that often the burning smell is a minor problem such as a galley oven or alike, and can be easily corrected. Opponents suggest that checklists waste valuable time when dealing with smoke and fire, and the only answer is to land the plane. As I mentioned in the newsletter, short of major structural damage, smoke and / or fire is probably the worst in-flight emergency. There are no easy answers and the debate will continue. http://www.aviationnewsweb.com/~aviation1/safetyup.htm (link no longer works) The easy answer in my opinion is to treat the odor of smoke very seriously on any aircraft, not just the MD-11. I hope that the TSB will emphasize this in the final report. I suspect they will. | ||||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |